In the age of great power competition, wars are increasingly waged by proxy. Instead of meeting on the battlefield, major powers are armed, financed, informed, and militarily assisted partners fighting each other in other regions. From Europe to the Middle East, today’s wars more and more look like external powers are fighting on different sides, supporting, but not formally joining, the fight. This growing dependence on proxy warfare marks a transformation of international conflict at its core.
Archives
How New Zealand Lost the Capacity for Independent Foreign Policy
On 1 March 2026, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Foreign Minister Winston Peters issued a joint statement addressing the American and Israeli strikes on Iran. Their response was carefully calibrated. They neither endorsed the attacks nor openly opposed them. Instead, they noted that New Zealand recognised the operations as intended to prevent Iran from continuing to pose a threat to international peace and security. The phrasing felt notably restrained, almost to the point of detachment.
How Britain became a Belligerent without Declaring it
On the evening of 1 March 2026, Sir Keir Starmer addressed the House of Commons and set out a seemingly firm boundary. Britain, he stated, would permit American forces to use selected UK bases for narrowly defined defensive operations against Iranian missile sites nothing beyond that. There would be no British aircraft conducting strikes and no deployment of troops into active combat. His language was deliberate and restrained. Yet within an hour, a drone struck the runway at RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus. The aircraft involved had taken off before Starmer had even finished speaking.
Mojtaba Khamenei and Iran’s Legitimacy Crisis
On 12 March 2026, Iran’s state television broadcast what officials described as the first statement from the country’s newly appointed Supreme Leader. Rather than hearing directly from Mojtaba Khamenei, viewers were shown a still image of him while a news presenter read the statement aloud. There was no recorded speech, no live appearance, and no video message. The individual constitutionally designated as Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, protector of the Islamic Revolution, and earthly representative of the Hidden Imam had not appeared publicly or spoken since his appointment three days earlier.
Taiwan must Learn the Lessons of the Iran War
The outbreak of war in Iran demonstrates the critical importance of air defence systems, as the country’s leadership was eliminated during the initial strikes and its ability to coordinate defence collapsed within hours. Equally important, the conflict highlights the asymmetric power of drones. Iran used its drone arsenal to strike targets across the Gulf, hitting Bahrain, Kuwait, and Dubai, while Israel’s Iron Dome continued to show the value of a layered defensive architecture, although it also revealed certain limitations
Churchill’s Oil vs. Modi’s LPG: What WW2 tells us about Energy
There is a temptation, watching India’s LPG crisis unfold in March 2026, to invoke the Second World War as a counterpoint, an era when civilisation itself was at stake, yet somehow, fuel still moved, kitchens still burned, and industrial supply chains held together well enough to sustain a global war effort. The comparison is emotionally satisfying. It is also, at first glance, historically plausible. But the data tells a more complicated and ultimately more instructive story
While the Missiles Fall, Beijing Watches and Learns
The public record on China’s response to the Iran war is clear and unremarkable. Since US and Israeli forces launched Operation Epic Fury on February 28, Beijing has condemned the strikes as violations of international law, called for an immediate ceasefire, and dispatched Special Envoy Zhai Jun to the region. It has evacuated over 3,000 Chinese citizens from Iran. Foreign Minister Wang Yi has made calls to counterparts in Russia, Iran, Oman, France, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE.
The 2026 India-US Trade Reset and the Future of the Indo-Pacific
The India-US relationship came to a standstill during the Trump 2.0 administration, with skyrocketing tariffs up to 50 percent since August 2025, creating an economic burden on India. Within the unpredictable geopolitical environment, the interim trade agreement between India and the United States finally came to terms in February 2026, but the recent ruling of the US Supreme Court brought the deal to a halt. The Supreme Court struck down Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, ruling that he cannot use the 1977 emergency powers law to slap blanket duties on nearly every country.
Centuries of Suppression, Sixteen Years of Reform: The UGC Debate is not just About Regulation
Negating the facts of the present is possible, but the past is inevitable. On January 13, 2026, the UGC (University Grants Commission of India) replaced its 2012 Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions Regulations. This replacement created dissent all over the country. The most asked questions by critics were, “Why is the judiciary system turning biased?”, “Revoke the black law”, and, finally, the question of reverse discrimination.
NATO’s Most Dangerous Member Just Got More Dangerous
When the United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran on February 28, 2026, every NATO member was forced to decide where it stood. Most followed Washington’s lead quietly, if not enthusiastically. Spain refused use of its bases and triggered a furious response from the White House. France and Germany called for restraint. Turkey reacted in a way that was more complex than the other countries. It condemned the strikes as a violation of international law and blocked coalition forces from using its airspace and bases. When Iran’s Supreme Leader was assassinated, Turkey publicly mourned the loss